Public Jobs, Private Gatekeepers: The Technocratic Erosion of Rights

This follow-up to Government Jobs Sells Your Data to 3rd Party Brokers explores the systemic shift in power from citizens to private tech vendors and government authorities through economic coercion and technocratic control.

I was interested in applying for the Temporary Parks Worker I position in Sunnyvale, CA. However, I encountered a significant barrier with the online application system (GovernmentJobs.com / NeoGov).

Specifically: the system requires applicants to agree to extensive third-party tracking and data-sharing, including marketing, analytics, and advertising, as a precondition, before even viewing or applying for jobs. This precondition shifts the balance of power and rights away from jobseekers and toward the government and Neogov, as data brokers, especially in a challenged economy.

In a challenged economy marked by rising costs of living, inflation, and stagnant wages, applicants are under increasing financial pressure, often forced to accept invasive terms just to access public employment opportunities. This dynamic erodes meaningful consent and transforms a public right into a privatized privilege.

I inquired with HR and was informed that there is no alternative method to apply, such as using a resume, job application for, or other in-person submission.

The city’s use of a centralized hiring platform provides convenience to the city and profit to Neogov, but places an undue burden of those who do not wish to have their data sold to third party vendors as a cost of applying for work as public servants.

ActorTraditional RoleNew Role (With NeoGov)
Citizen/JobseekerRights-bearing participant in public lifeData subject, user, consumer
GovernmentProvider of fair, equal opportunityDelegator of access to private platform
NeoGovContractor/Tech VendorGatekeeper + Data Broker

While NeoGov is a private vendor, the hiring process remains a public function. When access to city employment is conditioned on agreement to third-party surveillance, it raises several potential constitutional concerns:

First Amendment – Compelled agreement to terms involving speech and data-sharing as a condition of applying for public employment;

Fourth Amendment – Collection and potential disclosure of personal data (e.g., IP address, device ID, phone number) without individualized suspicion, warrant, or true consent;

Fourteenth Amendment (Due Process) – Lack of alternative means effectively denies fair access to public employment for individuals unwilling to waive privacy rights.

Application methods must not require third-party tracking and data sharing as a condition of employment access. As applicants for public employment, we have a legal right to access government services without being forced to surrender constitutional and privacy protections.

Citizens are being forced into behavioral contracts under financial duress. Without viable alternatives, jobseekers have effectively been stripped of their public right to view and apply for civic jobs. What began as a convenient hiring portal has morphed into a gateway controlled by private interests, where access is conditioned on surrendering personal data to NeoGov for resale. Government and corporations are supplanting our rights in a pay-to-play system designed to control the struggling poor. This is technocratic neofeudalism.

Public employment must remain public in function and in access. Application methods must not require third-party tracking, profiling, or data-sharing as a precondition for participation in government service. At a minimum, a privacy-respecting application alternative must be provided, consistent with constitutional protections and basic fairness.

If this cannot be accommodated, the City of Sunnyvale and other government entities using NeoGov must formally acknowledge that no privacy-respecting application process is currently available. This will help clarify the government’s position and may be relevant for future legal review or public records inquiries.

We are ready and eager to work, and I believe in the importance of public service jobs being accessible to all.

Government Jobs Sells Your Data to 3rd Party Brokers

Can the government force you to accept invasive third-party tracking — like sharing your phone number, IP address, and device info — just to apply for public employment?

That’s exactly what I’m facing with the City of Sunnyvale and their platform GovernmentJobs.com (operated by NeoGov). Before even viewing or applying for jobs like Temporary Parks Worker I, applicants must consent to the collection and sale of personal data — including device IDs, IP addresses, phone numbers, and marketing profiles shared with data brokers and advertisers.

Data shared with: affiliates; service providers;
online advertising and analytics partners; entities for legal purposes; entities for
organizational transfers

Here’s the link to NeoGov’s policy: https://www.governmentjobs.com/home/privacypolicy

Don’t agree, and you can’t apply. They’ll prompt you to delete your account.

Agree, else you can't apply: prompt you to delete your account.

Is This Legal?
Does this violate our rights to privacy, freedom of association, or due process when there’s no alternative way to apply?

When government functions rely on private platforms, our rights don’t disappear. But by outsourcing public job applications to NeoGov, the government is sidestepping those protections.

What’s New?
In 2025, NeoGov updated their policy. They now share your personal data with advertisers and data brokers — essentially selling your info — before you can even view or apply for a government job.

NeoGov isn’t just a job portal anymore, they’re now a commercial data hub profiting off our government job applications.

This raises serious legal concerns:

  • Fourth Amendment violations: Forcing applicants to give up private data without probable cause or a warrant.
  • CCPA breaches: Sharing personal information without clear, informed consent and no opt-out violates the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA/CPRA) and California Constitution Article I, Section 1 (Right to Privacy).
  • Due process and equal protection: Blocking access to public jobs unless applicants surrender privacy rights.

I reached out to the City of Sunnyvale, but they refuse to offer alternative application methods. This situation threatens not just individual privacy but sets a troubling precedent for public employment and government accountability.

Let’s stand up for our rights respectfully. If you’re concerned, here are some contacts:

Together, we can push back against these invasive practices and demand that public employment remain accessible without compromising our fundamental rights. Rights are like muscles — if you don’t exercise them, they get weaker.